✦ Gauhati High Court · 06 Jun 2022

SRI RATAN DEKA and 2 ORS v. Swaran Singh & Ors.

NANI TAGIA3 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
06 Jun 2022
Bench
NANI TAGIA

Outcome

Disposed of

The instant appeal stands disposed of, in terms above

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. In view of the above, the appellant Insurance Company shall deposit the remaining 50% amount, along with the interest awarded in terms of the judgment and award dated 17.06.2017, passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Kamrup (M) Guwahati, in MAC Case…
  • Para 99. The instant appeal stands disposed of, in terms above.

Judgment

SRI RATAN DEKA and 2 ORS S/O LATE SUBHARAM DEKA, SARTHEBARI (DABAR SOAP), P.S. SARTHEBARI, P.O. SARTHEBARI-781307, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. 2:MRS. HAMIDA KHATUN W/O MR. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED R/O BIRUBARI P.S. PALTANBAZAR P.O. PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI 781008 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. 3:HARE KRISHNA RAJBONGSHI S/O SRI NABIN RAJBONGSHI R/O BANGRABARI P.O. BARAMA 781346 DIST. NALBARI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, Mr. R. C. Paul Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. A G CHOUDHURY Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA Date : 06-06-2022 ORDER Heard Mr. R. C. Paul, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. A. G. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1/claimant.

2.

Respondent nos. 2 & 3 have also been duly served as indicated in the order dated 08.04.2022.

3.

This appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, is directed against the judgment and award dated 17.06.2017, passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Kamrup (M) Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 1664 of 2012, directing the appellant Insurance Company to pay a compensation amount of Rs. 2,76,406/-, which is inclusive of no fault liability along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e.

10.09.2012, till payment.

4.

The only contention raised by Mr. Paul, learned counsel for the appellant is that since there was a violation of the policy of insurance pertaining to the validity of the driving license of the driver, the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned award, fastening the liability to pay the compensation on the appellant insurance company has failed to provide the Insurance Company liberty to pay and recover from the owner of the vehicles as held in the case of National Insurance Company Limited vs. Swaran Singh & Ors., Page No.# 3/4 reported in 2004 3 SCC 297.

5.

The learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company, Mr. Paul, therefore, submits that the appellant would like to pay the entire awarded amount in terms of the impugned award passed by the learned Tribunal to the respondent no. 1/claimant and recover the said amount from the respondent no. 2, the owner of the vehicle, for violation of the Insurance policy as regards the driving license of the deriver as per the principle of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision cited above, namely, National Insurance Company Limited vs. Swaran Singh & Ors. (supra).

6.

Mr. Paul further submits that 50% of the awarded amount has already been deposited by the appellant Insurance Company before the Registry by this Court in terms of order dated 26.04.2019, passed in IA(C)No. 1377/2019, which amount has also been withdrawn by the respondent no. 1/claimant. The aforesaid withdrawal of the amount by the respondent no. 1/claimant, have not been disputed by Ms. A. G. Choudhury, learned counsel representing the respondent no. 1.

7.

In view of the above, the appellant Insurance Company shall deposit the remaining 50% amount, along with the interest awarded in terms of the judgment and award dated 17.06.2017, passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Kamrup (M) Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 1664 of 2012, before the Registry of this Court within 6 (six) weeks from today. On depositing of the aforesaid rest of the amount along with the interest as indicated hereinabove, the respondent no. 1/claimant shall be at liberty to withdraw the Page No.# 4/4 deposited amount on being properly identified by the engaged counsel and by following the due process of identification as notified by the Registry of this Court, from time to time.

8.

Appellant shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application before the learned Tribunal for recovery of the compensation amount paid to the respondent no. 1/claimant, herein, from the respondent no. 2/owner of the vehicle, as may be permissible under the law.

Operative part

9.

The instant appeal stands disposed of, in terms above.

10.

Since the appeal has been disposed of, the statutory amount of Rs. 25,000/- deposited by the appellant/Insurance Company shall be refunded to the appellant/Insurance Company by the Registry. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The instant appeal stands disposed of, in terms above

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gauhati High Court, on 06 Jun 2022. The bench was NANI TAGIA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments