OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 17939/2025 ANUP KUMAR RAMPAL v. UNION OF INDIA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J JANUARY 16, 2026 rl
Judgment
Cause title
SBM-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 17939/2025 ANUP KUMAR RAMPAL ...... Petitioner Through:
Petitioner in person (through VC)
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocates for UOI.
Ms. Shahana Farah, Additional Standing Counsel for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
% 16.01.2026 CM APPL. 2987/2026 (seeking correction in judgement dated 17.12.2025)
Present application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner seeking clerical correction in para 4 of the judgement dated 17.12.2025, to the effect that the “Delhi Water Board Act, 1998” shall be read as “Delhi Jal Board Act, 1998”.
No such correction is required.
The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 2986/2026 (seeking clarification of judgement dated 17.12.2025)
Present application has been moved by the applicant/petitioner seeking clarification of the judgment dated 17.12.2025.
After hearing the applicant, who appears in person, it is deemed appropriate to await the compliance of the directions of this Court in the judgement dated 17.12.2025, by DDA and DJB or, if required, the Central This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:43:41 Government, for which a period of three months has been provided in para 11 of the judgement.
Operative part
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J JANUARY 16, 2026 rl
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Delhi Water Board Act, 1998; Delhi Jal Board Act, 1998.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.