✦ Delhi High Court

Ms. Mukta Gupta v. No. 1 is the Superintending Engineer

CRL.) Nos. 1053-54 of 20054 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

This writ petition is allowed and stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

This writ petition is allowed and stands disposed of accordingly. AUGUST 07,2006, a WP (Crl.) No. 1,053-54/2005 I Uffi^"F+ S.N. AGGARWAL, J Page No. 4 of4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is allowed and stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Delhi Water Board Act, 1998 — ss. 92, 95, 100; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 2.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.) Nos. 1053-54 of 2005). ← Search more judgments