IN TTIE HIGII COURT OF DELIII AT NEW DELI{I v. BHARAT SANCHARNI!{y LIMITED
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The aPPlications are disPosed of'
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the above statement' application are disPosed of' F JUI\E 01,2011 the writ Petition and the Pending S. MURALIDIIAR' J I I J.
Judgment
' Petitioner Through ft4t' fV' Vi'*u"uthan' Senior Advocate *iift i,it. Manali Singhal' Advocate {r. vefsus BHARATSANCHARNIGAMLIMITED.....Respondent Through lvlr' M;nder Singh' Senior Advocate with Ms. pratibha il singh, I\4r^' Gaurav sharma #i rtit' rqveer Singh Bhatia' Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDIIAR ORDER Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMULYA r\Pj_r
Operative part
01.06.2011 Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions' The aPPlications are disPosed of' 1& u2u ? Turrurn*for some time' IvIr' Ramji srinivasan' learned senior for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw these i'.]jj.l, ; order to file review petitions before the Telecom Disputes ;;;J, ---, +LacP T\i.mrfcc Sefilement & APPellate Tribunal'
In view of the above statement' application are disPosed of' F JUI\E 01,2011 the writ Petition and the Pending S. MURALIDIIAR' J I I J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.