✦ Delhi High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberfy as prayed for

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberfy as prayed for. MAY 20,2011 S. MT]RALIDHAR, J W. P. (C) Nos.6686 & 7374/2010 Poge 2 of2

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w. P. (o 66s6l2010 MOHD. FAHEEM ..... Petitioner Through: Mohd. Mohsin Israily, Advocate. VEISUS \-{^ AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING BOARD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None. AND w.P. (c\ 7374/2010 KULDEEP SAHNI ..... Petitioner Through: Mohd. Mohsin Israily, Advocate. VETSUS AGRICI]LTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING B OARD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDIIAR ORDER 20.0s.2011 #r6 + o

#1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw these writ petitions with liberly to seek other appropriate remedies as may be available W. P. (C) Nos.6686 & 7374/2010 Page I of2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMULYA I to the Petitioners in accordance with law.

#2. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberfy as prayed for. MAY 20,2011 S. MT]RALIDHAR, J W. P. (C) Nos.6686 & 7374/2010 Poge 2 of2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments