TARANJEET KAUR & Ors. v. Ms. Neelam Rathore, Advocate along
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The present application and the petition stand disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151; O. XXIII r. 3
Judgment
Operative part
Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate along with petitioner No. I in person versus 1 PARMNDER SINGH FC+ Through: Ms. Neelam Rathore, Advocate along with ..... Respondent respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REV A KHETRAPAL O/o ORDER 24.07.2008 IA No.7971/2008 (u/0-23 R-3 read with Section 151 CPC) This is a joint application filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. The application is signed by the petitioner N o.1 herself and on behalf of her minor son - the petitioner No.2 as well as by the respondent and their respective counsel. The application is also supported by the affidavits of the petitioner No. I and the respondent. The terms and conditions of Signature Not Verified Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. T T T T r TW T -- r--..-. 1114 tan fWIW compromise, which have been reduced into writing by way of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 6th July, 2008 and is signed by the parties, is enclosed with the application as Annexure A-1. It is prayed in the application that the compromise between the parties as recorded in the aforesaid MOU dated 6th July, 2008 may be read as part and parcel of the present application and a decree be passed in terms thereof. Both the parties are present m Court today. Let their statements be recorded. JULY 24, 2008 REV A KHETRAPAL,J The statements of the parties have been recorded, according to which the parties have agreed and undertaken to abide by the terms of settlement as recorded in the MOU (Exhibit P-1 ). The undertakings of the parties are taken on record and accepted by the Court. The parties shall abide by the terms of settlement arrived at between them as recorded in the Memorandum of Understanding. A decree-sheet be drawn up in terms of the Memorandmr of Understanding. The present application and the petition stand disposed of accordingly. T T r r.- T T T T ""W"""T'". t W t'W I NIM There will be no order as to costs. The date before the learned Joint Registrar on 301 h July, 2008 is cancelled. IA Nos.13450/2007, 4143/2008 and 4144/2008 In view of the orders passed above, these applications stand disposed of. l-- µ.,.J REVA KHETRAPAL,J JULY 24, 2008 ( l T . '1 '11T n T l · i- TT T 1T rTT CIMlll •11
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present application and the petition stand disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXIII r. 3.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.