✦ Delhi High Court

I l v. KRISHAN KUMAR & Ors.

REV A KHETRAPAL

Case at a glance

Bench
REV A KHETRAPAL

Judgment

ORDER 18.10.2010 There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant. The application for substitution of the legal representatives of the appellant has not been filed till date though this Court was informed on November 18, 2009 by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant had expired. Presumably, the legal representatives are not interested in . ' prosecuting the matter. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the appellant to move for restoration of the appeal within 8 weeks from today by filing an application for the substitution of the legal representatives of the appella:1t. t.,_ REV A KHETRAPAL, J OCTOBER 18, 2010 Signature Not Verified Signing Date:12.08.2024 17:00:54 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments