✦ Delhi High Court

MOHAMMADFAIZAN v. COMMISSIONEROFCUSTOMS

Judgment

$~96*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)9519/2025MOHAMMADFAIZAN.....PetitionerThrough:Dr.Ashutosh, Adv.versusCOMMISSIONEROFCUSTOMS.....RespondentThrough:None.CORAM:JUSTICEPRATHIBAM.SINGHJUSTICERENUBHATNAGARORDER%26.11.20251.Thishearinghasbeendonethroughhybridmode.2.Thismatterisbeingtakenuptoday, as25thNovember,2025wasdeclaredaholidayonaccountof‘GuruTeghBahadur’sMartyrdomDay’videNotificationNo.35/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC.3.Dr.Ashutosh, ld. CounselforthePetitionerwishestowithdrawthepresentpetition.4.Accordingly, thepresentpetitionisdismissedaswithdrawn. Allpendingapplications, ifany, aredisposedof.PRATHIBAM.SINGH,J.RENUBHATNAGAR,J.NOVEMBER26,2025Rahul/ck

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments