DEEPAK v. MUNICIPALCORPORATIONOFDELHI.....RespondentsThrough & Ors.
Judgment
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)1065/2026DEEPAK.....PetitionerThrough: Mr.A.K.Mishra, Adv. (M:-9650732474)with Petitionerinperson.versusMUNICIPALCORPORATIONOFDELHIANDORS......RespondentsThrough: Ms.NamrataMukimStandingCounselwithMs.NiharikaSingh, AdvocateforMCD(M:9899106515).Mr.ChiranjivKumar, AdvocatealongwithMr.MukeshSachdeva, AdvocateforRespondentno2.CORAM:JUSTICEPRATHIBAM.SINGHJUSTICEMADHUJAINORDER%24.04.20261.Thishearinghasbeendonethroughhybridmode.
ThePetitionerispresentinCourt. Aftersomehearing, the Petitionerwishestowithdrawthepresentpetition. Thesameisdismissedaswithdrawn.
TheMCDisfreetotakeactioninaccordancewithlaw.
Thepresentpetitionisdisposedof.PRATHIBAM.SINGH,J.MADHUJAIN,J.APRIL24,2026/dj/sm
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.