M/SMALWAAUTOMOBILESPVTLTD v. UNIONOFINDIA.....RespondentsThrough & Ors.
Judgment
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)4509/2023&CMAPPL.7599/2025M/SMALWAAUTOMOBILESPVTLTD.....PetitionerThrough: Mr.VineetGarg, Adv. (M:8750137505)versusUNIONOFINDIA&ORS......RespondentsThrough: Mr.JaiAhuja, Adv.forMr.1HarpreetSingh, SeniorStandingCounsel. (M:9971564044)CORAM:JUSTICEPRATHIBAM.SINGHJUSTICEDHARMESHSHARMAORDER%07.02.20251.Thishearinghasbeendonethroughhybridmode.CMAPPL.7599/2025(forrestorationofthepetition)inW.P.(C)4509/20232.ThisisanapplicationfiledbytheApplicant/PetitionerunderSection151ofCivilProcedureCodeseekingtorestorethemainwritpetition, beingW.P.(C)4509/2023,whichwasdismissedfornon-prosecutiononthelastdatei.e.,24thJanuary,2025inthefollowingterms:
3. CounteraffidavitonbehalfofRespondentNo.2hasbeenfiled. However, therejoinderhasnotbeenfileddespiterepeatedopportunities. ThereisalsonoappearanceonbehalfofthePetitioner. Evenonthelasttwodatesofhearing, thereisnoappearance, whichhasbeenrecorded. 4. Thepresentpetitionisdismissedfornon-prosecution. 5. Ld.counselfortheRespondentssubmitsthattheissuesraisedinthispetitionisalreadycoveredinthe This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:34:54 decisionofthisCourtinVianaarHomesPrivateLimitedv. AssistantCommissioner(Circle-12),CentralGoods&ServicesTax&Ors.,[W.P.(C)2245/2020,decidedon27thFebruary,2020].
3. Today, learnedCounselforthePetitionerappearedandsubmittedthathewasunabletoappearonthelastdateofhearing,i.e.,January24,2025,ashehadinadvertentlymisheardthenextdateofhearingduringthepriorproceedingheldonNovember5,20244.Accordingtold. CounselfortheRespondents, thismatterisnowcoveredbythejudgmentmentionedinthesaidorderdated24thJanuary,2025.5.However, Ld.CounselforthePetitionersubmitsthatthismatterisconnectedwithbatchmatterspendingbeforethisCourt, whichareawaitingthedecisionofthefullbenchheadedbyJusticeYashwantVermainW.P.(C)No.13325/2018titledas‘KTC(India)Pvt. Ltd.v.CommissionerofCentralGSTAudit-IIDelhi&Anr.’6.Accordingly, listthismatteron24thApril,2025alongwiththesaidbatchmatters.PRATHIBAM.SINGH,J.DHARMESHSHARMA,J.FEBRUARY7,2025/dk/Am
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.