SHRIAZIZURREHMAN v. GOVT.OFNCTOFDELHI.....RespondentsThrough & Ors.
Judgment
$~24*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C)2598/2018SHRIAZIZURREHMAN.....PetitionerThrough:None.versusGOVT.OFNCTOFDELHIANDORS......RespondentsThrough:Mr.SanjayKumarPathak, StandingCounselwithMr.SunilKumarJha, Mrs.K.K.KiranPathak, Mr.MohdSuebAkhtar&Mrs. JoohuKumari, AdvocatesforLACR-1&2.(M:9793585441)Ms.PrabhsahayKaur, StandingCounselwithMs.DeekshaL.Kakar, PanelLawyer, Mr.AdityaVerma, Ms.AntaraMishra&Ms.SanaParveen, Advs.forDDA.(M:9968446016)MsManikaTripathy, SCforDDA.(M:8447750298)CORAM:JUSTICEPRATHIBAM.SINGHJUSTICEMADHUJAINORDER%23.04.20261.Thishearinghasbeendonethroughhybridmode.2.On2ndFebruary,2026,directionwasissuedbytheCourttotheRegistryinthefollowingterms:“4.ThecontactdetailsofthePetitioneraresetbelow:Sh.AzizurRehmanS/oSh.ShamshurRehmanR/oJE-29,GuptaColony, MalivyaNagar, NewDelhi-1100175.LettheRegistryissuenoticeinthismattertothe This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 13:08:46 Petitionerastowhythepetitionshouldnotbedismissedfornon-prosecution.6.ListbeforeJointRegistraron27thFebruary,2026.7.ListbeforeCourton23rdApril,2026.”3.Today, ld. Registrar(Judicial)hasreportedthattheservicecouldnotbeaffecteduponthePetitionerdespiterepeatednoticesbeingissued.4.ThePetitionerappearstobenolongerinterestedinpursuingthepresentwritpetition.5.Accordingly, thepresentwritpetitionisdismissedfornon-prosecution.PRATHIBAM.SINGH,J.MADHUJAIN,J.APRIL23,2026/dk/ss
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.