✦ Delhi High Court · 10 Feb 2025

SURENDER SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & Ors.

NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, E SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, reserving the liberty of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to avail of his remedies in accordance with law.

Judgment

.....Respondents Through: Mr.K. D. Sharma, SPC for UOI Major Anish Muralidhar, Army. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 7826/2025 (Exemption) 1. 2. The same is disposed of. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1609/2025 3. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking the following prayers: time-bound Issue an appropriate writ, order, or

1. the nature of Mandamus direction directing the Respondents to conduct a court- supervised, videography into the actions of Col. Amit Bisht including and other fabrication of documents, misuse of medical procedures, and obstruction of justice. 2. fabricated documents, involved officers, Declare all inquiry Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 1609/2025 Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Date:15.02.2025 16:37:04 the Petitioner's the Release Medical Board including proceedings, pension orders, and any other fraudulent records, as null and void, thereby restoring professional status. 3. Direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner as a serving Army personnel with immediate effect, along with all benefits and entitlements that were unjustly withheld. 4. Award adequate compensation for the immense mental, physical, and emotional trauma caused due to: a. b. Forceful detention for 10 months in a military hospital without due process. Administration of harmful drugs and attempts to endanger the Petitioner's life. Harassment and humiliation for the past 5. nine years due to fabricated allegations and denial of justice. 6. Considering the severity of these actions and the prolonged struggle, the Petitioner prays for compensation of 2 crore as a token of justice for the violations of fundamental rights and the irreparable damage caused to dignity and well-being. 7. legal and disciplinary action against Col. Amit Bisht and other officers involved in the conspiracy, including their removal from service and prosecution under the applicable laws. 8. Pass any other or further writ, order, or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just, and proper facts and circumstances of the case in favor of the Petitioner and against the Respondents.

Direct strict

4.

The learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice of this petition, submits that the petition raises a dispute relating to a ‘service matter’, as defined in Section 3 (o) of the Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 1609/2025 Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Date:15.02.2025 16:37:04 Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. Therefore, the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy of approaching the learned Armed Forces Tribunal to seek the relief prayed for.

5.

The petitioner, who appears in person, submits that the present petition raises important questions regarding the functioning of the respondents and how the petitioner has been victimized in his service.

6.

We are afraid that we would not like to go into these submissions in the present petition.

7.

The petitioner, by way of the present petition, is clearly raising disputes with respect to ‘service matters’, as defined in Section 3 (o) of the AFT Act. Therefore, he has an alternate efficacious remedy in the form of approaching the learned Tribunal by way of an application under Section 14 of the AFT Act for the same relief.

Operative part

8.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to avail of his remedies in accordance with law.

9.

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in the present petition. NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J FEBRUARY 10, 2025/sg/DG Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 1609/2025 Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Date:15.02.2025 16:37:04

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, reserving the liberty of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Delhi High Court, on 10 Feb 2025. The bench was NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, E SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments