DALIP KHOSLA v. STATE & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Considering the above settlement, the petition is disposed of in terms
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XXIII r. 3
Key paragraphs
- Para 1212. Petition is disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of as infructuous.
Judgment
Through: Ms. Ruksana, Ms. Kashvi Dutta, Advocates for R-4 & 5. Mr. Rudra Dutta, Mr. Anuj Mishra, Advocates for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL %
O R D E R 11.02.2025 I.A. 3587/2025 (Application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)
This application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been moved jointly by the petitioner and respondent nos.3-6 to dispose of the petition in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 6th February 2025.
The application is supported by affidavits of petitioner and respondent nos.3-6. The agreement has also been signed by the parties who settled the matter between themselves in relation to the estate of Late Shri Inder Kumar Khosla.
The Will appointed two executors, Mr. Sanjiv Mishra and Mr. Maneesh Uppal.
Mr. Sanjiv Mishra has signed the settlement and is also present in the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 12:10:10 Court to confirm the same. Mr. Maneesh Uppal was arrayed as respondent no.2 in the said petition; however, he has not appeared in the proceedings ever since commencement.
Both Mr. Sanjiv Mishra and Mr. Maneesh Uppal were trustees in the deed of Inder Khosla Trust, which has since been dissolved by the Dissolution Deed dated 31st January 2025 duly signed by Mr. Sanjiv Mishra, Mr. Maneesh Uppal and the third trustee, Ms. Sangeeta Mishra. A copy of the said has been handed up in Court.
Respondent nos.3-6 are also present in Court and confirm the terms of the settlement.
Operative part
Petitioner’s Power of Attorney is also present in Court. Considering the above settlement, the petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
Decree be drawn up in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
Parties shall abide by the terms of the settlement. The Court has perused settlement and finds it to be lawful and acceptable.
Compliances under the settlement shall be done by the parties on an expeditious basis. In the event of non-compliance of the said order, the parties are at liberty to approach the Court.
Petition is disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of as infructuous.
Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J FEBRUARY 11, 2025/ak/tk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 12:10:10
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Considering the above settlement, the petition is disposed of in terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXIII r. 3.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Delhi High Court, on 06 Feb 2025. The bench was ANISH DAYAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.