Ghanshyam v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With this observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL
Judgment
Ghanshyam, S/o Shri Indrapal, Aged About 47 Years R/o Vill - Chainpur, Tehsil Manendragarh, Dist -Manendragarh -Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) Present R/o Vill - Kelhari, Tehsil Manendragarh, Dist - Manendragarh - Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Dist - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Manendragarh -Chrimiri -Bharatpur, Dist -Manendragarh- Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar, Manendragarh, Dist -Manendragarh-Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board
07.08.2026
The petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking following reliefs:- 2 “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the Courts below.
10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondent No. 03 to take action upon the application for division made by the petitioner in accordance with law and to decide the same within stipulated time frame as directed by this Hon'ble Court.
10.3 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 02 to take action against respondent No. 03 as per provision of Chhattisgarh Lok Sewa Guarantee Act, 2011.
10.4 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem fit in the interest of justice.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the application is not being decided by the concerned Tahsildar in respect of partition.
Learned counsel for the State has made an objection that the application itself is not filed in the appropriate format and that the petitioner has to file an appropriate application before the concerned Tahsildar in respect of partition, while properly making 3 the required parties, who are required to be noticed, which has not been done in this case.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and to file an appropriate application before the concerned Tahsildar in the proper format in respect of partition, as prayed by him.
With this observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.