Core Banking System Technical Officer/programmer, Zila Sahakari v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Co-Operative Society
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner raises dispute before the authority concerned under Section 15(2) of the Act of 1960, the authority concerned is directed to decide it expeditiously, strictly in accordance with the law.…
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6070 of 2018 Mohd. Asif Khan S/o Mohd. Touseef Khan Aged About 40 Years Posted As Core Banking System Technical Officer/programmer, Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus
#1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Co-Operative Society Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
#2. Registrar Co-Operative Society, Block- B, Second And Third Floor, Vibhagadhyash Karyalaya, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
#3. Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh.
#4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Behind Jhankar Talkies, Kevramunda Ward, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner For State For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate : Mr. R.C.S. Deo, Panel Lawyer : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
08.05 .2026
#1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy available under Section 15(2) of Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
#2. No objection from the other side.
#3. Permission granted. 2
#4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner raises dispute before the authority concerned under Section 15(2) of the Act of 1960, the authority concerned is directed to decide it expeditiously, strictly in accordance with the law. JUDGE Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) $iddhant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — s. 15(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.