Purushottam Bareth v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage,
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under law.
Judgment
For Petitioners For Respondents-State For Respondents No. 4 to 6 : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate : Mr. Sibashish Mishra, Advocate : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 02 /03/2026
#1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the petitioners the revised consolidated remuneration of Rs. 23,350/- per month on the post of Data Entry Operator in terms of the order dated 02.08.2023 (Annexure P/4) issued by the Finance Department with effect from the year 2023.
10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay all consequential arrears to the petitioners for the period from 2023 onwards, being the difference between the amount actually paid and the revised pay of Rs. 23,350 per month.
10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass such further orders or directions as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
#2. Learned counsel for the Respondents No. 4 to 6 raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that petitioner is an employee of the Respondents/Cooperative Society and therefore, the petitioner is having the alternate efficacious remedy of filing a suit under Section 55 (2) of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. 3
#3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other remedy available under the law.
#4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under law.
#5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Dey
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — s. 55(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.