Pratibha Sakhare v. Union Of India Through- Secretary Ministry Of Railway Rail Bhawan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Madhurima
Judgment
Pratibha Sakhare W/o Shri B. Ishwar Rao Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Chief Reservation Supervisor At Railway Station Uslapur South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through- Secretary Ministry Of Railway Rail Bhawan New Delhi 2 - Divisional Railway Manager South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Additional Divisional Railway Manager (Op) South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Divisional Railway Manager Office South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 5 - Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer South East Central Railway Personnel Department Divisional Railway Manager Office Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Divisional Personnel Officer Personnel Department Divisional Railway Manager Office South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Assistant Personnel Officer - I I I Personnel Department Divisional Railway Manager Office South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate For Union : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 26/05/2026
The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the respondent no. 7/Assistant Personnel Officer- III, Personnel Department, Divisional Railway Manager Office, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Uslapur to Raigarh.
The Central Government in exercise of power conferred under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has issued notification confirming jurisdiction with regard to service dispute to the Central Administrative Tribunal, therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable before this Court, however, liberty is 3 granted to the petitioner to take remedy available to him under the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Madhurima
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 — s. 14; Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.