Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Consequently, the appeal Is dismissed as withdraom
Provisions considered
- MotorVehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Smt. Asha Shah, aged about 32 years, w/o Dilip Shah, Cad;e- Teli, R/o Qtr. No.LIG-150, R.P.Nagar (Rajendra Prasad Nagar) Korba, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Owner) Appeal under Section 173 of the MotorVehicles Act 1988 Present: Shri Goutam Khetrapal, counsel for the appellant. ORAL…
Judgment
Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Miscellaneous Appeal (C.) (PR) No.316 of2008 Appellant Respondents <*i 4-<:<-? 4^fi/o^ • Limited, The National tnsurance Company through Divisional Manager, Divisional OfRce - Taha Comptex, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Biiaspur (C.G.) vei'sus
Vibhuti Singh, aged about 44 years, S/o Sukhpal Slngh, R/o Katghora, P.S. & Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (C.G.), at present R/o Geetanjall Nagar, Bus-Stand, Bilaspur, P.S. City Kotwali, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Claimant)
Pappu Das Mahant, aged about 27 years, S/o Itwari Das Mahant, R/o Niharika Road, Korba, P.S. Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) (Driver)
Operative part
Smt. Asha Shah, aged about 32 years, w/o Dilip Shah, Cad;e- Teli, R/o Qtr. No.LIG-150, R.P.Nagar (Rajendra Prasad Nagar) Korba, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Owner) Appeal under Section 173 of the MotorVehicles Act 1988 Present: Shri Goutam Khetrapal, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28m day of March, 2008) Heard on I.A.No.1/2008, an application for wthdrawal of the appeal. Shri Gbutam Khetrapal, learned counsel appearing for (2) appellant submitted that the application t.A.No.1/2008 has been flled on the ground that (Sompensation. the ownerTias deposited the entire amount of For the reasons mentioned in the application I.A.No.1/2008, it is (3) allowed. Consequently, the appeal Is dismissed as withdraom.j Sdf- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, the appeal Is dismissed as withdraom
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
MotorVehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.