Hon'bSe Shri Dslip Raosaheb Deshmukh,. J v. Kodan Satnami
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The Deaier, Trade Arun Ralpur, (C.G.) Consjgns, Devpuri, 'Insurance The Manager, Company Bajaj AJiance Branch Limited, Shivmohan Bhawan, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri, Raipur, (C.G.) Plaza, E.G. Misc. Agsoeal under Sectlon 173 of the MotorVehicles Act 1988. Present: " Shri P. K. Tuisyan, counse! for…
Judgment
Hon'bSe Shri Dslip Raosaheb Deshmukh,. J. APPELLANT Bhagirathi Son of Bishat Satnami, aged about 35 years, Resident of Viil'age Pendri, Station Suheia, District Raipur (C.G.) Police Driver (Owner Offendlrsg Vehicle i.e. Tractor & Troiiey, unregistered Mahindra TracSor 275/D.i.) RESPONDENTS J'<i Versus
Kodan Satnami Son of Bodhiya Satnami, aged about 70 years; Smt. Sukaihin BaE Wifet of Kodan Satnami, aged about 60 years; SuheSa, Station' Both resident of Viilage Pendri, Pollce District Raipur (C.G.) (Clalmants) The Manager, Insurance Company Limited, A-22, Sector 1, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) (Insyrer) Tokiyo Generai
The Deaier, Trade Arun Ralpur, (C.G.) Consjgns, Devpuri, 'Insurance The Manager, Company Bajaj AJiance Branch Limited, Shivmohan Bhawan, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri, Raipur, (C.G.) Plaza, E.G. Misc. Agsoeal under Sectlon 173 of the MotorVehicles Act 1988. Present: " Shri P. K. Tuisyan, counse! for the appeilant. 'ORAL_ORDER ^Passed on 25th September, 2007) ^ Learned counsel for the appeiiant submits that he wants to withdraw this appeal with iiberty to file a fresh appeal raising other avaiiable grounds. (2) In vlew of the submlssion made above, this Miscellaneous Appeai dismissed as withdrawn. The appeilant Is at llberty.to ta.ke recourse to. such remedy as is available to him under iaw. IVSoney recelpt of, deposit of the statutory amount, if any fiied in original, be returned to the learned counsei for the appeliant. ^tKl. (3) In view of the above, i.A. No.1 for grant of stay, I. A.No.2 for taking receipt on record and IA.No .3 for taking document on record stand disposed of. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.