Wnt Petition^o. 1249 pf 2004 v. The State of Chhattisgarh & aaother
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of fhe above subinissions raade by learaed coiuisel ^- appeadng for fhe parties the instant petition is atlowed. The notice dated 26.2.2004 (Annexure P/1) is quashed. However, the respondents shall be at liberty to forword the caste certificate to fhe High Level…
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ^(</'' Wnt Petition^o. 1249 pf 2004 Petitioner Bhimrao Parate Versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & aaother WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri T. K. Tiwad, Advocate for tiie petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Pauel La^Tyer for fhe respoudents. ORDBR(€h-all (Passed on this 21st day of October, 2009) Heard,
The petitioner is aggneved by fhe notice dated 26,2.2004 (Aunexure P/l), issued by the ofllce of the Collector, Durg, whereby tlie petitioner has been directed to appear before flie Assistaat Collector, Durg along wifh necessary docuinents for ti.ie purpose of verification of the caste certilicate issued to tlie petltiouer.
Learaed counsel appearmg for th.e petitioner submits fhat xieitih.er tlie respondent No. 2 has aay auftiority to determme fhe caste of tlie petitioner nor to veiify tiie caste certi&cate issued to petitioner, tlierefoi-e notice
26.2.2004 (Annexure P/ 1), issued to fhe petitioner is without jurisdiction.
Leaiiie.d counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that he has no objection if tlie notice dated 26.2.2004 (Annexiire P/l), issued to tlie petitioner, is quashed witli Ubert\r to tiie respoudents to refer fhe caste certificate issued to the petitiouer to the conipetent authorily i.e. High Level Caste Scnitiay ConiiDittee, Chhattisgai'h for verification.
In view of fhe above subinissions raade by learaed coiuisel ^- appeadng for fhe parties the instant petition is atlowed. The notice dated 26.2.2004 (Annexure P/1) is quashed. However, the respondents shall be at liberty to forword the caste certificate to fhe High Level Caste Scrutmy Comiuittee, Chhattisgai'h for verification of fhe caste/ social stat.us certt&cate of the petitioner as per guidelmes prescribed by fhe Suprenie Court ia Madhiiri Patil Vs. Additiozial Com.mr. Tribiisial Developmeist1 aiid State of Maharashtra asid ofehers Vs<. Ra^i Prakash Babii!al Parmar2. The said CoraBiittee shall decide the laater after affordiiig opportunity of heariag to fhe parties, iii accordaace with tlie guideUnes prescribed by the Suprenie Court ia Madhiiri Patil (supra) aad Ravi Prakasfa Babulal Siagh Parmar (supra). No order asto costs. Thalair Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 AIR 1995 SC 94) 2007 (1) SCC 40
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.