✦ Allahabad High Court · 22 Jan 2025

Radha Charan v. State Of U.P & Anr.

WRIT - C No. 29592 of 2024SHEKHAR B SARAF, VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that respondent No.1 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and judgment of the Supreme Court in Kumari Madhuri Patil and another vs. Additional Commissioner…
  • Para 44. Accordingly, respondent No.1/District Magistrate, Kushinagar, is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of sixteen weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
  • Para 55. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 DKS

Judgment

1.

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2.

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent No.1 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated August 16, 2023.

3.

Upon due consideration, we are of the view that respondent No.1 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and judgment of the Supreme Court in Kumari Madhuri Patil and another vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribai Development and others, AIR 1995 SC 94.

4.

Accordingly, respondent No.1/District Magistrate, Kushinagar, is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of sixteen weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Operative part

5.

In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 DKS

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 22 Jan 2025. The bench was SHEKHAR B SARAF, VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 29592 of 2024). ← Search more judgments