✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Judgment · High Court

VJ.C.C No. 277 of 2009SUNIL KUMAR SJNHA

Judgment

Present: Ms. Maya Verma, counsel for the petitioner. ORDER (3rd August, 2009) The foliowino order of the Court was passed Rajeev Gypta, CJ. Ms. Maya Verma, learned counsei for the petitioner is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioner is seeking restoration of M.A.(C) No.776/2009 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 30.06.2009 3) On due consideration of the submissions of tearned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, satisfied absence petJtioner's/aDpellant's counset on 30.06.2009, when MA. (C)No. 776/2009 was taken up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds. 4) M.C.C. No.277/2009, therefore, is allowed M.A.(C) No.776/2009 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. VJ.C.C No. 277 of 2009). ← Search more judgments