COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT v. The Cojjector, District Janjglr Champa, Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
Judgment
Sanat Kumsr Kashyap, S/o. Shri Kapll Nath Kashyap, Aged about 40 years, R/o, Viliage Konargarh, TahslS Pamgarh, Dlstrict Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh m w.p. Present: Shri N.K. Agrawai, learned Deputy A.dvocate GeneraE fbr the petitjoners. OR D E R (10tn Septemb.er, 2008) TrThe following the Court was passed C.J.: ^-. ^ Shri N.K. Agrawai; learned Deputy Advocate Genera! for the petltioners is heard !Vi.(C).P.N o.165/2004, a petition for cpndonation of deiay in fiiing the petition for review / modlflcation of the order datsd 25.08.2003 passed in W.P. No.2212/2003. 2) On due consideration, we are satisfied that the petitioners have succeeded In showing sufficient eause for the deiay In filing the petition for revievtf / modificatlon. :~^l k -> '^ ..^'•^^Si 3) M. (C.) PNo. 165/2004, therefore, is ailowed and the deiay in flting the petition for review/modification is hereby condoned. 4) Shrl N.K. Agrawai; learned Deputy Advocate General is heard on petltion for review / modification. 5) The petitloners are seeking review / modlfjcatlon of the order dated 25.08.2003 passed in W.P. No.2212/2003, whereby the writ petition flled by the respondent was disposed of in the followjng ''^ terms: !n view of th& abov.e directlons given by the Hon'bSe Apex Court, the Government of Chhattisgam may aiso consider for absorbing the surplus employees who had worked under the in the iight of the dtrection Census Department given by the Hon'ble Apex Court and th8 liberty petitioner for absorptlon and on his moving, Govemment the Government of Chhattisgarh, the Department of Gsnera! Admlnistratlon may conslder hls representatlon appropriately. approach In order, No.6792/2003 . M(W.)P. i.A. No.1999/2003 dlsposeo' of. Wlth these observations, the wrlt petltjon Is disposed of. " 6) On due consideration of the submisslons of iearned Deputy y^- . Advocate Generai, we do not flnd any ground warranting revlew/ modificatlon-of the order dated 25.08.2003. 7) The petltion for review / modiflcation, therefore, fails and Is hereby dismlssed. Sd/- Chief Justice r—~~ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge , . . < }..:.-\' "Y
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.