Rameshwar Sahu v. Smt. Gauri Bai Sahu
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, R N CHANDRAKAR
Judgment
Rameshwar Sahu , S/o Shri Manohar Sahu, aged about 23 years. 3 2 Manohar Sahu, S/o Shri Sukhram Sahu, aged about 44 years. Smt. Sita Bai Sahu, W/o Shri Manohar Sahu, aged about 40 years. All at Village Kauwatal, Police Station Kotra Road, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) resident Versus RESPONDENTS 1 2 years, Occupation Smt. Gauri Bai Sahu, W/o Shri Rameshwar Sahu, aged about 22 Nil, Resident at Village Kauwatal, Police Station Kotra Road, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) at Village Presehtly residing Tundri, Police Station & Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgeer- Champa (C.G.) The of Chhattisgarh, thorugh the, Collector, District Janjgeer-Champa (C.G.) State APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19 f1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT.1984 Appearance: Mr. Roop Naik, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Advocate for respondent1. Mr. Akhil Mishra, Dy. Government Advocate for State/respondent2. Appellant No. 1 and Respondent No. 1 (Husband and Wife) both are also present in person. -^- "s ORDER (10.07.2013) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. The appellants have filed I.A. No. 02/2013 for withdrawal of the appeal. This is not opposed. I.A. No. 02/2013, therefore, is allowed and the appeal F'/ dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the above, interim order dated 01/02/2012, stands vacated. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge ^
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.