BS.^ v. (1) Hidayatullah National
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR W.P^NO;^ ^-C f 2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS:- Abhishek PriyaAnand S/o Df. S. Baran, aged about 28 years, R/o Aashiyana Colony, Sector- M, 819, Lucknow [U.P.] ' • . • . . s- VERSUS (1) Hidayatullah National University, H.N.L.U Bh^ivan, Raipur[C.G.]492001, Through its Registrar. '(2) TheVice Chancellor, Hidayatullah National University Bhavan, Raipur[C.G.],492001. Law Law (3) The Executive Council, Hidayatyllah National Law ^fc University, H.N.L.U Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] 492 001, Through - Registrar, the Secretary of fhe Executive Council; .^^^ ^Q^. "^- \0 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/ 227 QF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "s'^ -<^'. ,•<"" c HSGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITiON (CT N0. 4626 OF 2006 PETiTIQNER Abhishek Priya Anand Versus RESPONDENTS Hidavatuitah Nationat Law Universitv & Others (Writ Petition under Articte 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Nons for the petitiones Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER ('OPEN COURT'i (Passsd on 08th day of Januap,', 2013)
The matter is catled for hearing twice, none appeare nor is any representation made on behaif of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. Sn view ofthe above, the petition is dssmissed for want of prosecution. A&li Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.