✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Trilochan Patel, age ,42(^cy^ears, of Shri Kg^war Charan, son v. State of Chhattisgarh

SATISHK AGNIHOTRI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Trilochan Patel, age ,42(^cy^ears, of Shri Kg^war Charan, resident of village Amarkot, Vikash Distt. Khand-Saraipali, Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary, Department Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 'r A^,-:^ ^.>-"^^ Panchayat The Deputy Director, Department Rural Development Department, Distt. Mahasamund, (C.G.) .^-^>"\ ^^"•''y' ^>^Y .- ^ *A.-U The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Mahasamund (CG) Collector, The Mahasamund (C.G.) District WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI^S 2^6/227 OF THE .^" CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR WRIT PETiTIQN No. 1277 ot 2004 PETITjONER Trilochen Patei. RESPONDENTS V E R SUS St&te of Chhattisaarti & Others. WR!T PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226^27 OF THECONSTITUTiON OFJNDIA 8Bs Shrl ic, Agnllwtri, J. Prgsent: Shri Bhaskar Payasl, Advocate for the petitioner. Shfi Pank&j Shrivastava, Panei Lawyer for ths State. ORDERiOPENCOURT] (Passed on 25 day of Aprii, 2013)

1. Learned counsel appearing for th& petitioner, on instiuctions, aibmits that this petition has become infructuous.

2.

Learned counsel appearing tor other sjde conairs with !he sforesaid submission.

3.

in view of the above; !his Is (jismissed ss having beaime infructuous.

4.

Consequently, M(W)P No. 1 144/2004, alsostand dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments