✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

WRIT PETITION N0.1662 OF 1995 v. Raipur Development Authority (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) & Ors.

SATISHK AGNIHOTRI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Regjstry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 1

Judgment

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.1662 OF 1995 PETITIONER Shiv Kumar Tamrakar Versus RESPONDENTS Raipur Development Authority & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for thepetitioner. Shri Manish Nigam, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER COPEN COURT) (Passed on this 5th day of March, 2013) S]Btis!*»ita3«

1.

The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter.

3.

In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Regjstry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 1

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments