✦ Patna High Court

Nandu Ray @ Abhinandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89825 of 2024CHANDRA PRAKASH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The application stands allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. The application stands allowed. atul/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH Mr.Nalin Kumar Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ORAL ORDER 2 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 12 of 2024 dated 12.01.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the prosecution case, eight unknown miscreants ridden on three motorcycles came and overtook the motorcycle of the informant and snatched away the bag and the motorcycle of the informant. They also assaulted the informant with knife which hit in his right side.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89825 of 2024(2) dt.17-01-2025 this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Sandeep Kumar. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 21.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67425/2024. The petitioner has four antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since

12.02.2024.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 12 of 2024.

Operative part

7.

The application stands allowed. atul/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89825 of 2024). ← Search more judgments