Mantosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. The application stands allowed. Gautam/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Adv. Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 528 of 2024 dated 22.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 317(5), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
As per the prosecution case, a stolen Apache motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioners which was taken from the co-accused, Lallu @ Aashiq Kumar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85130 of 2024(2) dt.15-01-2025 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The said motorcycle was taken from the co-accused, Lallu @ Aashiq Kumar but they were unaware that it was stolen property. The petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 23.08.2024.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 528 of 2024.
Operative part
The application stands allowed. Gautam/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.