✦ Patna High Court

Surendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83043 of 2023CHANDRA PRAKASH2 min read

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83043 of 2023(2) dt.19-01-2024 that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is accused in one more criminal case as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.…

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Hemant Kumar For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 396 of 2018 dated

29.12.2018 for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

4.

As per the prosecution case, total 8.640 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered from ditch, near the house of the petitioner.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83043 of 2023(2) dt.19-01-2024 that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is accused in one more criminal case as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. The recovery is made from an open place which is accessible to anyone. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83043 of 2023(2) dt.19-01-2024 enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 396 of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. atul/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83043 of 2023). ← Search more judgments