Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, without…
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma 2 29-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Pipra P.S. Case No. 229 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act,
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is granted.
Operative part
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 — s. 30(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.