Champaran v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, A.P.P. ORAL ORDER 2 17-07-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act,

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

Allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of liquor from the maize field of Sudama Singh.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44357 of 2023(2) dt.17-07-2023 and he came to be implicated by the local villagers but then the FIR does not disclose the name of the local villagers who disclosed the name of the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 330 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T