New Jai Steel a proprietory concern having its office at Basbariya Chowk v. State of Bihar through Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K VINOD CHANDRAN, RAJIV ROY
Outcome
Disposed of
directions, the writ petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act s. 112
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. With the above liberty, observation and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Rajiv Roy, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date NAFR
Judgment
Versus State of Bihar through Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its Office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.
Addl. Commissioner of State Tax (Appeals), Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
Asst. Commissioner of State Tax, Sitamarhi, Tirhut, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s
Mrs. Manju Jha, Advocate Mr. P .K. Shahi, A.G. Mr. Amish Kumar, A.C. to A.G. : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 12-12-2023 The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs.
2. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal") under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act").
3. However, due to non-constitution of the Patna High Court CWJC No.17005 of 2023 dt.12-12-2023 Tribunal, the petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy under Sub-Section (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act.
Under the circumstances, the petitioner is also prevented from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under Sub-section (8) of Section 112.
The respondent State authorities have acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in exercise of powers under Section 172 of the B.G.S.T Act, which provides that period of limitation for the purpose of preferring an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 112 shall start only after the date on which the President, or the State President, as the case may be, of the Tribunal after its constitution under Section 109 of the B.G.S.T Act, enters office.
This Court is, therefore, inclined to dispose of the instant writ petition in the following terms:- (i) Subject to deposit of a sum equal to 20 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, if not already deposited, in addition to the amount deposited earlier under Sub-Section Patna High Court CWJC No.17005 of 2023 dt.12-12-2023 (6) of Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves. The recovery of balance amount, and any steps that may have been taken in this regard will thus be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that similar relief has been granted by this Court in the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465 of 2022. (ii) The statutory relief of stay, on deposit of the statutory amount, however in the opinion of this Court, cannot be open ended. For balancing the equities, therefore, the Court is of the opinion that since order is being passed due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondent- Authorities, the petitioner would be required to present/file his appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, once the Tribunal is constituted and made functional and the President or the State President may enter office. The appeal would be required to be filed observing the statutory requirements after coming into existence of the Tribunal, for facilitating consideration of the appeal. (iii) In case the petitioner chooses not to avail the remedy of appeal by filing any appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act before the Tribunal within the period which may be specified upon constitution of the Tribunal, the respondent- Authorities would be at liberty to proceed further in the matter, in accordance with law. (iv) If the above order is complied with and a sum equivalent to 20 per cent of the remaining amount of the tax in dispute is paid then, if there Patna High Court CWJC No.17005 of 2023 dt.12-12-2023 is any attachment of the bank account of the petitioner pursuant to the demand, the same shall be released.
Operative part
With the above liberty, observation and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Rajiv Roy, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date NAFR
12.12.2023
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: directions, the writ petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act — s. 112.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.