Ram Kawal Yadav v. Patna
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 99. 10-04-2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri R. K. Priyadarshi, learned A.C. to Principal Addl. Advocate General, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. The prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed withdrawn. Anay (Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Judgment
All sons of Sri Raghu Nath Yadav, residents of village – Bagen Tola, P.S. – Brahampur, District – Buxar. .... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jyoti Shankar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (P.A.A.G.) Mr. S.K.Tiwary ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
10-04-2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri R. K. Priyadarshi, learned A.C. to Principal Addl. Advocate General, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. The prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed withdrawn. Anay (Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.