Chanda Kumari v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. sonal/- U (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Judgment
9. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Adv. Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. Mr.Hemant Ray, Adv. Mr.Md. Raisul Haque ( SC-10 ) For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH : 2 03-04-2024
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the ORAL ORDER following relief(s):-
1.i) For quashing the order dated 06.06.2019 passed by District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Sitamarhi in Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 04/2018 whereby and whereunder the learned Collector passed the exparte order, setting aside the order dated 25.02.2017 passed by the D.P.O., Sitamarhi, Patna High Court CWJC No.21196 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 who confirmed the selection of the petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Sevika in Mushachak, Ward No. 05 at Anganwari Centre No. 107 under Bairgania Block, District: Sitamarhi; and also quashing the order dated 15.6.2021 passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Sitamarhi in Anganwari Appeal Case No. 25/2020, which was remanded on the direction of Divisional Commissioner, Trihut Division, Muzaffarpur in 1.C.D.S. Appeal Case No. 192/2019 vide order dated 29.05.2020, refusing to pass the order as who is not being the competent authority to pass the order in this matter. ii) For quashing of the order dated 29.05.2020 passed by Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Commissionary. Muzaffarpur in 1.C.D.S. Appeal Case No. 192/2019, by which the learned Commissioner, Muzaffazrpur dismissed the appeal and remanded the matter before the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. Further, a writ of Mandamus be issued. i) For direction to the respondent authorities to restore the service of the petitioner on its original place with all cumulative benefits.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent Patna High Court CWJC No.21196 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
Operative part
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. sonal/- U (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.