✦ Patna High Court

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 11147 of 2015MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Ajay/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

Judgment

6.

The State Of Bihar The Principal Secretary, Science and Technology Department, Technical Bhawan, Government of Bihar, The Joint Secretary, Science and Technology Department Technical Bhawan, Government of Bihar, Patna The Deputy Secretar, Science and Technolocy Department Technical Bhawan, Government of Bihar, Patna The Director, Science and Technology Department Technical Bhawan, Government of Bihar, Patna. The Principal Government Polytechnic College, Saharsa, District - Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH Mr.Gopal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Akash Raj, AC to GA-5 : : 2 24-08-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the ORAL ORDER following relief:-

1. That this writ application is directed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ / writs direction quashing the order dated 24.04.2015 passed by Respondent No. 2, Principal Secretary, Science and Technology, Government of Bihar issued vide Memo No. 992 dated 29.04.2015 contained in Annexure 9 whereby and whereunder he has illegally rejected the claim of the Petitioner for Patna High Court CWJC No.11147 of 2015(2) dt.24-08-2023 extension of his service on the post of Lecturer Department of Humanity in Government Polytechnic College, Saharsa. This writ petition is further directed for issuance of a direction commanding and directing the Respondents authorities concerned not to act in a discriminatory manner with the Petitioner directing them to extend the service of Petitioner with effect from 16.03.2012 on the post of Lecturer Department of Humanity with all consequential benefit to which he is found entitled under law.

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

Operative part

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Ajay/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 11147 of 2015). ← Search more judgments