Raju Kumar Singh v. The Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SANJAY KAROL, S KUMAR
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms
Provisions considered
- SARFAESI Act, 2002 s. 13(2)
Judgment
The Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank through its Authorised Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. The Authorised Officer, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Sasaram, Rohtas. The Branch Manager, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Nahauna Branch Sasaram (Rohtas). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s :
Operative part
Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Prasad, Advocate Mr. Suresh Pd Singh No.1, Advocate : For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/Hon’ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 3 16-02-2022 Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) : -
For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the impugned Recall Notice dated 27.10.2021 along with demand Notice dated 28.10.2021 issued by the Respondents, whereby and whereunder the petitioner payment of entire loan amount of both Loan Account 7378AB00000149 vide Recall/02 notice dated 27.10.2021 and demand notice dt.28.10.21 under Section 13 (2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
been directed 73788700000071 Patna High Court CWJC No.21012 of 2021(3) dt.16-02-2022 Shri Suresh Prasad Singh, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondent Bank, states that till and so long as the petitioner fulfils the contractual obligations, in terms of the intervening developments, pending consideration of the present application, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. We are informed that the respondent Bank has taken action of regularizing the petitioner’s account. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner shall adhere to the time-schedule fixed by the Bank. Statement accepted and taken on record. Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/chn U
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
SARFAESI Act, 2002 — s. 13(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.