✦ Allahabad High Court · 21 Jan 2025

Malik Asafak & Anr. v. Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance

WRIT - C No. 197 of 2025RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR

Case at a glance

Decided
21 Jan 2025
Bench
RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR
Neutral citation
2025:AHC-LKO:3875-DB

Outcome

Dismissed

Writ petition is dismissed only for this reason

Judgment

Operative part

Sri Paavan Awasthi, learned counsel for the Union of India has placed before us the notification dated 17.06.2025 (which is taken on record) by which such housing financial companies registered under sub-section (5) of Section 29A of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, having assets worth rupees one hundred crore and above, have been specified as financial institutions for the purposes of SARFAESI Act, 2002. He has also placed before us a list of such financial institutions having assets worth Rs. 100 crore and above as on 31.03.2024 which includes opposite party no. 3 at Srl No. 26, which is also taken on record. The contention of the petitioners' counsel was that the SARFAESI Act, 2002 does not apply to opposite party no. 3 and in fact the Act which applies is the National Housing Bank Act, 1987. However, on being pointed out that there is a notification dated 17.06.2021, the next argument of petitioners' counsel is that inspite of the said notification, it is the procedure prescribed under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, which is a special Act, which will apply and not the SARFAESI Act, 2002. Once by the notification dated 17.06.2021, the SARFAESI Act, 2002 has been made applicable and the said notification is not under challenge before us, then we are unable to consider the relief prayed for especially as the opposite party no. 3 is a private financial company. Writ petition is dismissed only for this reason without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners to pursue other remedies as may be prescribed under law. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Nitesh NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is dismissed only for this reason

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

SARFAESI Act, 2002; National Housing Bank Act, 1987 — s. 29A.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 21 Jan 2025. The bench was RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 197 of 2025). ← Search more judgments