Vijay Rai v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJENDRA KUMAR
Outcome
Dismissed
application stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
.... .... Opposite Party. ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ----------- 3 12-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the order dated 19.5.2010 passed in N.D.P.S. Case No. 2 of 2009 by the court of Special Judge, Saran at Chapra, taking cognizance of the offence under Section 20(B)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, against the petitioner and one other co-accused. Apparently, I find no illegality in the impugned order amounting to abuse of the process of the court. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the points, as raised herein, at the appropriate stage in the trial court. P.S./- (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 20(B)(ii).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.