Arbind Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JAYANANDAN SINGH
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 149, 308, 341, 379, 504
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In retaliation, the informant has lodged this case alleging some Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30629 of 2013 (2) dt.01-10-2013 overt act by the petitioners on 20.4.2013 itself. But the first page of the FIR shows that the information was received to the police station…
Judgment
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-10-2013 Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No.49/13 registered for the offence under Sections 149, 341, 504, 308, 379 and 34 of the IPC. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was some incident on 20.4.2013 for which petitioners’ side had instituted an FIR on the next day itself i.e. on 21st in which the informant of the present case was also an accused, vide Annexure-
In retaliation, the informant has lodged this case alleging some Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30629 of 2013 (2) dt.01-10-2013 overt act by the petitioners on 20.4.2013 itself. But the first page of the FIR shows that the information was received to the police station on 27.4.2013. Thus, apparently the present FIR is an afterthought and only in retaliation to the FIR instituted by the petitioners’ side. Considering the above submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners supported by Annexure-1 and 2, this application is allowed. The petitioners shall surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and upon their so surrendering they shall be allowed bail by the court below on such reasonable terms and conditions as it may consider fit and proper. (Jayanandan Singh, J) Arvind/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.