SAHABUDDIN @ MD. SAHABUDDIN v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, and recovery of illicit liquor in huge quantity as well as criminal antecedent of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, the same is rejected. A.K.V.//- U T (Nawneet Kumar Pandey…
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ORAL ORDER 2 02-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patahi (Pachpakari) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
As per allegation, 420 litres of Nepali liquor is recovered from house of the co-accused whereas this petitioner along with the co-accused persons is said to have kept the said liquor for sale.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the the recovery Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52732 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 whatsoever has been made has no concern with the petitioner. The petitioner has been implicated in the present case on mere suspicion at the instance of his enemy. The petitioner is in custody since 03-06-2024.
Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, and recovery of illicit liquor in huge quantity as well as criminal antecedent of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, the same is rejected. A.K.V.//- U T (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.