Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ORAL ORDER 4 06-09-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 559 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
As per allegation, on a secret information, the informant along with police personnel reached the place of occurrence and on search 300 liters of spirit has been recovered from the drums.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is under custody since 02.05.2024. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47734 of 2024(4) dt.06-09-2024
On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named is directed to furnish bail bond after three months from today and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Court, Excise-I, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 559 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.