Ramashankar Ram v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
case, this application for regular bail is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 363, 366(A)
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 s. 4
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.
- Para 77. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran /concerned Court below in connection with Bharioganj…
Judgment
2. Maheshwar Ram S/O Late Asharfi Ram R/O Village- Nara Parsouni, Field Tola, Ke us par, P.S- Bhairoganj, Distt.- West Champaran. Versus ... ... Petitioner/s
The State of Bihar
Aysa Khatoon @ Asha Khatoon W/O Ahamad Miyan R/O Village- Nara Parsauni, Fild Tola, P.S- Bhairoganj, Distt.- West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Ms.Prerna Anand, Advocate Mr.Lalan Kumar, APP ORAL ORDER 8 19-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bharioganj P.S. Case No. 07/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A)/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the informant’s daughter.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that from the statement of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45678 of 2025(8) dt.19-12-2025 victim girl, it appears that she had herself left her house. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail and he is in custody since
08.08.2024. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
Operative part
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.
Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran /concerned Court below in connection with Bharioganj P.S. Case No. 07/2024. tusharika/- U T (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: case, this application for regular bail is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 363, 366(A); Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — s. 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.