MUKARRAM @ MUKRRAM v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 392
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ORAL ORDER 2 11-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is in jail in connection with Dighabank P.S. Case No. 100 of 2019 lodged on 26.11.2019 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the informant was working as a Door Help Banking Officer in Bandhan Bank, Tulsiya and after collecting Rs. 2,07, 435/- from the Female Self Help Group while he was on way back to deposit the amount in the bank, the four accused persons in two motorcycles hit his motorcycle and later snatched the amount along with his mobile. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and merely on the basis of confessional statement he has been implicated as an accused for which he is already in judicial custody since 15.05.2020 (as incorporated in paragraph- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57038 of 2021(2) dt.11-04-2022 18 of the bail application).
Operative part
Considering the aforesaid facts as also that the charge sheet has already been submitted in the case, it deems fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to imposition of some conditions in view of the fact that he has criminal antecedent (as disclosed in paragraph-3 of the bail application). Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Dighabank P.S. Case No. 100 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself; (iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his presence; (iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57038 of 2021(2) dt.11-04-2022 criminal offence again, failing which the State shall take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds; Jagdish/- U T (Rajiv Roy, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 392.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.