Udal Singh v. The Additional Collector cum Arbitrator, Aurangabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid
Provisions considered
- Highway Act, 1956
- RFCTLARR Act, 2013 s. 24(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Vijay Singh/- U (Rajiv Roy, J)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Sajid Salim Khan- Sc25 : : 2 24-06-2025 Heard the parties. ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): quashing the awarded dated
14.3.2016 passed under "Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which is amended award dated
31.5.2014 under section 3G of the national Highway Act, 1956 under Gazette notification dated 8.12.2010 without following mandatory requirements under section 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Patna High Court CWJC No.1849 of 2017(2) dt.24-06-2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to approach the Arbitrator in the matter against the order in question.
The respondents have no objection to it.
If such petition is preferred before the appropriate authority, he/she shall take into account the fact that the writ petitioner was pending before this Court for almost eight years while deciding the limitation petition.
Operative part
The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Vijay Singh/- U (Rajiv Roy, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Highway Act, 1956; RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — s. 24(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.