Pran Chaudhary v. The Additional Collector cum Arbitrator, Aurangabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- RFCTLARR Act, 2013 s. 24(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- U (Rajiv Roy, J)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Mr.Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr.Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 : : 2 04-08-2025 Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, learned counsel ORAL ORDER for the petitioner and the State.
The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for quashing the awarded dated
12.3.2016 passed under "Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which is amended award dated Patna High Court CWJC No.17474 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025
7.7.2014 under section 3G of the National Highway Act, 1956 under Gazette notification dated 8.12.2010 without following mandatory requirements under section 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he shall be approaching the competent authority for redressal of the grievance.
Learned State counsel has no objection.
Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- U (Rajiv Roy, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.