✦ Patna High Court

BALBANT RAI @ RAHUL RAI v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 35248 of 2022CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER Mr.Abhishek Kumar Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur 2 17-08-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur P.S. Case No. 948 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a)/32(ii)/34(ii)/36/41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 29.11.2021. The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trade of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of

4553.28 litres of illicit IMFL. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35248 of 2022(2) dt.17-08-2022 submitted that admittedly, petitioner is driver of the alleged vehicle, from where, recovery has been made. It is also submitted that nothing surfaced during course of investigation, which may suggest that the petitioner was under knowledge, as regard to consignment of illicit liquor and as such, it cannot be said that the alleged recovery has been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that seizure list is not supported by independent witnesses, which appears to be in violation of Section 100 (4) of the Cr.P.C. It is also submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, for which, charge- sheet has already been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that seizure list is not supported by independent witnesses. Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as the seizure list is disputed, where, petitioner is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Hajipur P.S. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35248 of 2022(2) dt.17-08-2022 Case No. 948 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive SpeciaL Excise Court No.1-cum-Additional District and Session Jjudge, Vaishali at Hajipur/concerned court, subject to the condition as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. S.Katyayan/- U T (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 35248 of 2022). ← Search more judgments