JAGESHWAR RAM v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER Mr.Satya Prakash Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, APP. 2 14-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. Recovery is of 150 liters of country made liquor. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that it appears from the FIR 150 liters country made mahua chulai liquor is said to have been recovered from a ditch situated at southern side of the house of the petitioner.
Operative part
He further submits that name of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17338 of 2022(2) dt.14-07-2022 petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused Satya Narayan Roy. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has no concern at all with the alleged recovery. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 20.11.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No.
222 of 2021 with the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17338 of 2022(2) dt.14-07-2022 by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. aditi/braj U T (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 — s. 30(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.