Surendra Singh v. Amarnath Singh
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN None Mr. : : ORAL ORDER 3 22-08-2025 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 22.06.2013 passed by the Sub Judge 1st, Gaya in Execution Case No.04 of 1999.
During the pendency of this writ application, changes have been introduced in the filing procedure, whereby Chapter IIIA of Rules of the High Court at Patna, 1916 has been Patna High Court CWJC No.20158 of 2013(3) dt.22-08-2025 substituted by C.S. No.151 dated 14.03.2016 (w.e.f.
01.04.2016), published in the Extraordinary Bihar Gazette No.208 dated 26.03.2016, which provides as follows:-
6. Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in respect of any order or any proceeding before any Civil Court, would be filed in Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction and would be numbered as Civil Miscellaneous No. (C. Misc. No.).
Since, the present writ application appears to have been filed in respect of an order/proceeding before a Civil Court, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps to convert the present writ application into a Civil Miscellaneous Case within six weeks from today. Thereafter, the Office shall proceed further in accordance with law. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.