Pappu Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act s. 30(a)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 437(3)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr. Dhramveer, Advocate Mr. Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara, APP ORAL ORDER 2 25-11-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual mode. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 245 of 2022, lodged under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. As per prosecution case, total recovery of 186.6 liter wine is subject matter of the present case, which was carrying on three different motorcycles. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. He also submits that petitioner is in custody since
12.08.2022 and charge-sheet has already been filed in this case. Learned counsel further submits that recovery of 62.4 liters of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59471 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 wine was made on the motorcycle but the motorcycle does not belong to the petitioner, and under a deep-rooted conspiracy, petitioner has been involved in this case. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum- Special Judge Excise I, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 245 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. With this observation, the bail application stands allowed. ravishankar/- U T (Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.